Open Access scholarly literature on Gastritis (2002-2021) in Web of Science: A Scientometric Analysis

Authors

  • Amir Amanullah PhD Research Scholar, Department of Library and Information Science, Annamalai University, Annamalai Nagar, Tamil Nadu
  • S Rajeswari Assistant Professor & Research Supervisor,, Department of Library & Information Science, Annamalai University, Annamalai Nagar, Tamil Nadu

Abstract

The present study is an endeavor to quantify the publication productivity on worldwide gastritis research output (open access) with the help of the available scientometric indicators and tools. The study discovered that there is an improvement in the Priority Index/Activity Index value of India from 2010. The RGR and DT values are calculated as 0.18 and 4.81 respectively while as the Degree of Collaboration is 0.967. Yamaoka Y, Malfertheiner P and Graham DY are the top three contributing authors, World Journal of Gastroenterology, Plos One and Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics are the top three journals that contributed most open access publications on gastritis. The top 20 most productive journals form the core zone journals which contribute to 33.26% of the total publications. USA, China and Japan occupy the top three positions in the list of prolific nations while as India ranks 16th.  35% of the total publications received citations in the range of 1-10 while as 3 publications received more than 1000 citations each.

References

Chen, Y.-S., & Leimkuhler, F. (1986). A Relationship Between Lotka ’ s Law , Bradford ’ s Law , and Zipf ’ s Law. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37(5), 307–314.

Digestive Disease. Gastroenterology, 144(4), 673–676. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2013.02.013

Dutt, B., & Nikam, K. (2015). A scientometric overview of collaboration pattern in global solar cell research. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 62(September), 157–167.

Dutt, B., Garg, K. C., & Bali, A. (2003). Scientometrics of the international journal “Scientometrics”. Scientometrics, 56(1), 81–93.

Elango, B., & Rajendran, P. (2012) . Authorship Trends and Collaboration Pattern in the Marine Sciences Literature : A Scientometric Study. International Journal of Information Dissemination and Technology, 2(3), 166–169.

Española de Documentación Científica, 35(1), 9–37 https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2012.1.851

Glänzel, W., A Bibliometric Analysis of Co-authorship Patterns of Eleven East Central European Countries in 90’s, In proceedings of the second Berlin workshop on scientometrics and informatrics 1-3 September 2000 p. 93–95.

González-albo, B., Moreno, L., Morillo, F., & Bordons, M. (2012). Bibliometric indicators for the analysis of the research performance of a multidisciplinary institution : the CSIC. Revista

H, M., MacRoberts, & MacRoberts, B. R. (1982). A Re-Evaluation of Lotka ’ s Law of Scientific Productivity. Social Studies of Science, 12(3), 443–450.

Jahina, S. R., Batcha, M. S., & Ahmad, M. (2021). Lotka ’ s Law and Pattern of Author Productivity in the Field of Brain Concussion: A Scientometric Analysis. Library Philosophy and Practice.

Karki, M. M. S., & Garg, K. C. (1997). Bibliometrics of Alkaloid Chemistry Research in India. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci, 37(2). 157–161.

Karki, M.M.S., Garg, K.C. and Sharma, Praveen, (2000). Activity and growth of Organic Chemistry Research in India 1971-1989. Scientometrics, 49(2), 279-288

Kundra, R., & Tomov, D., Types of Collaboration of Indian and Bulgarian Research in Epidemiology of Neoplasms in MEDLINE for 1966 – 1999, In proceedings of the second Berlin workshop on scientometrics and informatrics, 1-3 September 2000 p. 119–127.

Loomes, d. E., & zanten, s. V. Van. (2013). Bibliometrics of the Top 100 Clinical Articles in

Mahapatra, M., On the validity of the theory of Exponential Growth of Scientific Literature, In proceedings of the 15th IASLIC Conference, Bangalore, 26-29 December 1985, P.61-70

Mathankar, A. R. (2018). Bibliometrics: An Overview. International Journal of Library & Information Science, 7(3), 9–15.

Priya, N., & Ponnudurai, R. (2011). Studies On Relative Growth Rate And Doubling Time Of Conference Articles Productivity Of Neural Network Research. International Journal of Deverlopment Research, 1(4), 1–4.

Singh, G., Mittal, R., & Ahmad, M. (2007). A bibliometric study of literature on digital libraries. Electronic Library, 25(3), 342–348. https://doi.org/10.1108/02640470710754841 16. Frame, J.D. (1977). Mainstream research in Latin America and the Caribbean. Intersciencia, 2, 143-148.

Subramanyam, K. (1983). Bibliometric Studies of research Collaboration: A Review. Journal of Information Science, 6, 33–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/016555158300600105

Published

2022-06-30

How to Cite

Amanullah, A., & S Rajeswari. (2022). Open Access scholarly literature on Gastritis (2002-2021) in Web of Science: A Scientometric Analysis. International Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(6), 76–89. Retrieved from https://ijeponline.org/index.php/journal/article/view/293

Issue

Vol. 16 No. 6 (2022)

Section

Peer Review Articles
Copyright & Licensing
Copyright (c) 2022 © 2022 by The Authors. Creative Commons License This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Allows users to: distribute and copy the article; create extracts, abstracts, and other revised versions, adaptations or derivative works of or from an article (such as a translation); include in a collective work (such as an anthology); and text or data mine the article. These uses are permitted even for commercial purposes, provided the user: gives appropriate credit to the author(s) (with a link to the formal publication through the relevant URL ID); includes a link to the license; indicates if changes were made; and does not represent the author(s) as endorsing the adaptation of the article or modify the article in such a way as to damage the authors' honor or reputation. CC BY