Information technology and organisational performance

An integrative model of IT business value

Authors

  • Obieze Ewere Success Department of Business Administration Faculty of Management Sciences Delta State University, Abraka

Keywords:

information technology, business value, IT business value, performance

Abstract

Managing Information Technology (IT) investments continues to be a challenge for firms due to the difficulty associated with demonstrating IT contributions to organisational performance. Many IT contributions are not accounted for because they cannot be easily quantified. Linking IT to organisational performance is a complex problem that is informed by insights from multiple theoretical paradigms. This paper aims to comprehensively review work done by both academics and practitioners and to explore why new approaches to managing IT investments are needed. To achieve this aim, we will start by defining IT assets and business value and exploring the different dimensions used to measure the business value of IT. Then, we will look at the early research on IT business value and the emergence of the Productivity Paradox. After that, we will delve into the three current theoretical paradigms: economics, management and sociology. The theoretical lenses and models used in these paradigms will also be discussed. Finally, future research directions are suggested.

References

Alshawi, S., Irani, Z., & Baldwin, L. (2003). Editorial: Benchmarking: Information and communication technologies. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 10(4), 312–324.

Amran, M., & Kulatilaka, N. (1999). Real options: managing strategic investment in an uncertain world. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Aral, S., & Weili, P. (2007). IT assets, organizational capabilities, and firm performance: How resource allocations and organisational differences explain performance variation. Organisation Science, 18(5), 763–780.

Bakos, J. Y., & Brynjolfsson, E. (1993). From vendors to partners: Information technology and incomplete constructs in buyer-supplier relationships. Journal of Organisational Computing, 3(3), 301–308.

Bakos, J. Y., & Nault, B. R. (1997). Ownership and investment in electronic networks. Information Systems Research, 8(4), 321.

Baldwin, E., & Curley, M. (2007). Managing IT innovation for business value: Practical strategies for IT and business managers. China: Richard Bowles.

Bardhan, I., Whitaker, J., & Mithas, S. (2006). Information technology, production process outsourcing, and manufacturing plant performance. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(2), 13–40.

Barua, A., Kriebel, C. H., & Mukhopadhyay, T. (1995). Information technologies and business value: An analytic and empirical investigation. Information Systems Research, 6(1), 3–23.

Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. M. (1998). Beyond the productivity paradox. Communications of the ACM, 41(8), 49–55.

Chanopas, A., Krairit, D., & Khang, D. B. (2006). Managing information technology infrastructure: A new flexibility framework. Management Research News, 29(10), 632–651.

Henderson, J., & Venkatraman, N. (1994). Strategic alignment: A model for organisational transformation via information technology. In T. J. Allen & M. S. Scott Morton (Eds.), Information technology and the corporation of the 1990s (pp. 202–220). Oxford: Oxford University Press

Hoogeveen, D., & Oppelland, H. (2002). A socio-political model of the relationship between IT investments and business performance. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 8(8), 259b.

Huang, S.-M., Wu, C.-S., Chen, C.-M., & Lin, B. (2006). An empirical study of the relationship between IT investment and firm performance: A resource-based perspective. European Journal of Operational Research, 173(3), 984–999.

Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The Balanced Scorecard – measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71 - 79

Kumar, R. L. (1999). Understanding DSS value: An options perspective. Omega, 27(3), 295–304.

Kumar, R. L. (2004). A framework for assessing the business value of information technology infrastructures. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21(2), 11–32.

Lee, B., & Barua, A. (1999). An integrated assessment of productivity and efficiency impacts of information technology investments: Old data, new analysis and evidence. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 12(1), 21–43.

Lichtenberg, F. R. (1995). The output contributions of computer equipment and personnel: A firm-level analysis. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 3(3), 201–218.

Loveman, G. W. (1994). An assessment of the productivity impact of information technologies. In T. J. Allen & M. S. Scott Morton (Eds.), Information technology and the corporation of the 1990s: Research studies Cambridge University Press.

Lucas, H. C. (1993). The business value of information technology: A historical perspective and thoughts for future research. In R. D. Banker, R. J. Kauffman, & M. A. Mahmood (Eds.), Strategic information technology management: Perspectives on organisational growth and competitive advantage (pp. 359 – 374), PA: Idea Group Publishing.

Lucas, H. C. (1999). Information technology and the productivity paradox: Assessing the value of investing in IT. New York: Oxford University Press.

Published

2022-06-27

How to Cite

Success, O. E. (2022). Information technology and organisational performance: An integrative model of IT business value. International Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(6), 76–87. Retrieved from https://ijeponline.org/index.php/journal/article/view/284

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles