Tobacco Endgame: An economic justification for ending the Tobacco Epidemic in Malaysia

Authors

  • Chakrin Utit School of Business and Economics, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Wency Bui Kher Thinng School of Business and Economics, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia

Keywords:

economic impact, input-output modelling, Malaysia, tobacco endgame, tobacco industry

Abstract

The 150th session of the WHO's executive board meeting in Geneva witnessed Malaysia's stance on passing legislation to bring about a generational endgame to smoking by making the sale of tobacco products illegal to individuals born after 2007. Nevertheless, the policy move was opposed mainly by tobacco-related multinational corporations, putting forward their stand as a responsible industry contributing to economic growth. Therefore, this study assessed the contribution of the tobacco industry to Malaysia's economy to justify the relevance of the endgame strategy. An initial viewpoint based on the industry's developmental progress indicated that tobacco had not significantly contributed towards growth. Based on the input-output modelling technique, the findings from the input content and multiplier impact analyses substantiated this view, showing a mismatch between the industry's potential impacts and its actual contribution. The results also showed that the industry's growth prospects were unsustainable in the long term since the industry's integration with its domestic input suppliers relied mainly on contract-farming practices. Therefore, Malaysia's tobacco endgame strategy implementation is justified based on the study's findings.

References

Assunta, M., & Chapman, S. (2004). A mire of highly subjective and ineffective voluntary guidelines: Tobacco industry efforts to thwart tobacco control in Malaysia. Tobacco Control, 13(Suppl II), 43-50. https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.2004.008094

Barraclough, S., & Morrow, M. (2008). A grim contradiction: The practice and consequences of corporate social responsibility by British American Tobacco in Malaysia. Social Science and Medicine, 66(8), 1784–1796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.01.001

Barraclough, S., & Morrow, M. (2017). Tobacco and the Malays: ethnicity, health and the political economy of tobacco in Malaysia. Ethnicity and Health, 22(2), 130–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/13557858.2016.1244620

Bella, A., Swarnata, A., Vulovic, V., Nugroho, D., Meilissa, Y., Usman, U., & Dartanto, T. (2023). Macroeconomic impact of tobacco taxation in Indonesia. Tobacco Control, tc-2022-057735. https://doi.org/10.1136/tc-2022-057735

Das, M. (2022). Malaysia to ban tobacco sales to people born after 2005. The Lancet Oncology, 23(3), 331. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00067-5

Dietzenbacher, E., Los, B., Stehrer, R., Timmer, M., & de Vries, G. (2013). The Construction of World Input-Output Tables in the WIOD Project. Economic Systems Research, 25(1), 71–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2012.761180

DOSM. (2008). Malaysia Standard Industrial Classification 2008. Department of Statistics Malaysia: Putrajaya.

DOSM. (2014). Input-Output Table Malaysia 2010. Department of Statistics Malaysia: Putrajaya.

DOSM. (2018). Input-Output Table Malaysia 2015. Department of Statistics Malaysia: Putrajaya.

DOSM. (2021). Gross Domestic Product Income Approach. Department of Statistics Malaysia: Putrajaya.

Duarte, R., Sánchez-Chóliz, J., & Bielsa, J. (2002). Water use in the Spanish economy: An input-output approach. Ecological Economics, 43(1), 71-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00183-0

EPU. (2021). Twelfth Malaysia Plan, 2O21-2025: A Prosperous, Inclusive, Sustainable Malaysia. Economic Planning Unit: Putrajaya.

Husain, M. J., & Khondker, B. H. (2016). Tobacco-free Economy: A SAM-based Multiplier Model to Quantify the Impact of Changes in Tobacco Demand in Bangladesh. Margin, The Journal of Applied Economic Research, 10(1), 55–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973801015612665

Irvine, I. J., & Sims, W. A. (1997). Tobacco Control Legislation and Resource Allocation Effects. Canadian Public Policy, 23(3), 259-273. https://doi.org/10.2307/3551571

Lim, K. H., Jasvindar, K., Cheong, S. M., Ho, B. K., Lim, H. L., Teh, C. H., Lau, K. J., Suthahar, A., & Ambigga, D. (2016). Prevalence of smoking and its associated factors with smoking among elderly smokers in Malaysia: Findings from a nationwide population-based study. Tobacco Induced Diseases, 14(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12971-016-0073-z

McNicoll, I., & Boyle, S. (1992). Regional economic impact of a reduction of resident expenditure on cigarettes: A case study of Glasgow. Applied Economics, 24(3), 291–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036849200000141

NKTB. (2023, February 21). NKTB Profile. National Kenaf and Tobacco Board: Kota Bharu.

Pei Heng, P., Fadhli Mohd Yusoff, M., Mohd Ghazali, S., Pei Pei, H., Kuang Hock, L., Chien Huey, T., Mohamad Ghazali, S., Hui Li, L., Chee Cheong, K., Jia Hui, L., Jalan Lagoon Selatan, M., Sunway, B., & Jaya, S. (2020). Implementation of MPOWER Approach for Tobacco Control in Malaysia: Findings from the Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATs). Malaysian Journal of Medicine and Health Sciences, 16(1), 2636–9346. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338710436

Rahim, R. (2023, March 29). GEG Bill to be tabled soon, says Dr Zaliha. The Star. https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2023/03/29/geg-bill-to-be-tabled-soon-says-dr-zaliha

Saari, M. Y., Habibullah, M. S., Abd Rahman, M. D., Rosland, A., & Ismail, N. W. (2020). Assessing Performance of Third Industrial Master Plan Sub-sectors [Unpublished manuscript]. Institute of Agricultural and Food Policy Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia.

Song, Y., Liu, C., & Langston, C. (2006). Linkage measures of the construction sector using the hypothetical extraction method. Construction Management and Economics, 24(6), 579-589. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190500435358

Tan, Y. L., & Dorotheo, U. (2021). The Tobacco Control Atlas: ASEAN Region, Fifth Edition. Southeast Asia Tobacco Control Alliance, Bangkok, Thailand.

Temurshoev, U., & Oosterhaven, J. (2014). Analytical and empirical comparison of policy-relevant key sector measures. Spatial Economic Analysis, 9(3), 284-308. https://doi.org/10.1080/17421772.2014.930168

Utit, C., Rosland, A., Saari, M. Y., & Rahman, M. D. A. (2021). From Waste to Wealth: Identifying the Economic Impact of the Recycling Sector in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Economic Studies, 58(1), 125–143. https://doi.org/10.22452/MJES.vol58no1.7

Utit, C., Saari, M. Y., Hassan, A., & Ismail, T. H. T. (2015). Measuring the Embodied Waste among Industries in Malaysia. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 30, 228-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2015.10.041

Wijaya, I. R. A., Masyhuri, M., Irham, I., & Hartono, S. (2014). Input Output Analysis of Tobacco Processing in Jawa Timur Regency. Agro Ekonomi, 24(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.22146/agroekonomi.17355

World Health Organization. (2021, July 27). WHO reports progress in the fight against tobacco epidemic. https://www.who.int/news/item/27-07-2021-who-reports-progress-in-the-fight-against-tobacco-epidemic

Published

2026-02-23

How to Cite

Utit, C., & Thinng, W. B. K. (2026). Tobacco Endgame: An economic justification for ending the Tobacco Epidemic in Malaysia. International Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(2), 268–283. Retrieved from https://ijeponline.org/index.php/journal/article/view/1279

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles