Technical Efficiency of Power Sector In India: Data Envelopment Analysis
Abstract
This study intends to measure Productivity change of Power sector in India during the period of 2000-01 to 2013-14. To fulfill the objectives of the study secondary data has been collected from GOI, Indiastat.com and Ministry of Power. In this study the nature of efficiency and productivity change is investigated through the Malmquist Productivity Index (MPI).The Malmquist productivity index has the components which are used in performance measurement; such as changes in technical efficiency, change in technological change, change in pure technical efficiency, change in scale efficiency as well as change in Total factor productivity. This study has taken two highest power generating sources – thermal and hydro. Symbols here listed as DMU1 and DMU2 respectively. The results of the study show that DMU1 (thermal) is efficient than DMU2 (Hydro).
References
Azadeh, A., Ghaderi, F., Anvari, M., Izadbakhsh, H., & Dehghan, S. (2007). Performance assessment and optimization of thermal power plants by DEA BCC and multivariate analysis. Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research, 66, 860-872.
Bjurek, H. (1996). The Malmquist total factor productivity index. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 303-313.
Caves, D. W., Christensen, L. R., & Diewert, W. E. (1982). The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output, and productivity. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 50(6), 1393-1414.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. European journal of operational research, 2(6), 429-444.
Chen, K. H., & Yang, H. Y. (2011). A cross-country comparison of productivity growth using the Generalized Meta frontier Malmquist productivity index: With application to banking industries in Taiwan and China. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 35(3), 197-212.
Coelli, T. (1996). A guide to DEAP version 2.1: A data envelopment analysis (computer) program: Centre for efficiency and productivity analysis, university of new England, Australia, (96/08).
Fare, R., Grifell-Tatje, E., Grosskopf, S., & Lovell, C. K. (1997). Biased technical change and the Malmquist productivity index. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 99(1), 119-127.
Jain, S. & Thakur, T. (2010). Efficiency assessment of state owned electricity generation companies of India using data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Emerging Technology, 1(2), 32-35.
Jha, D. K., Yorino, N., & Zoka, Y. (2007). Benchmarking results of electricity generating plants in Nepal using modified DEA models. Osaka, Japan.
Mcmullen, B. S. & Okuyama, K. (2000). Productivity changes in the U.S motor carrier industry following de-regulation: A Malmquist approach. International Journal of Transport Economics, 27(3), 335-354.
Singh, A. (1998). Economic and policy dimensions of irrational use of electricity in agriculture. Indian Journal of Economics, 79, 189-192.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Allows users to: distribute and copy the article; create extracts, abstracts, and other revised versions, adaptations or derivative works of or from an article (such as a translation); include in a collective work (such as an anthology); and text or data mine the article. These uses are permitted even for commercial purposes, provided the user: gives appropriate credit to the author(s) (with a link to the formal publication through the relevant URL ID); includes a link to the license; indicates if changes were made; and does not represent the author(s) as endorsing the adaptation of the article or modify the article in such a way as to damage the authors' honor or reputation. CC BY



