Corporate governance, ESG, and innovation transparency: Evidence from French listed firms

Authors

  • Nadia Lakhal University of Sousse, LAMIDED Sousse, Tunisia
  • Asma Guizani University of Caen

Keywords:

Corporate governance, ESG disclosure, R&D transparency, Innovation CSRD

Abstract

This paper examines how corporate governance mechanisms influence the voluntary disclosure of research and development (R&D) activities within the broader framework of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) transparency. Drawing on an unbalanced panel of 341 French listed firms over the 2012–2023 period, we explore the role of key board characteristics including independence, gender diversity, size, and CEO duality in shaping the extent and quality of innovation-related disclosure. Using both fixed-effects and system GMM estimations, the study addresses endogeneity concerns and firm-specific heterogeneity. Our findings reveal that board independence and gender diversity are significant drivers of R&D and innovation transparency, consistent with agency and resource dependence theories. Conversely, CEO duality remains negatively associated with disclosure levels, indicating reduced oversight and weaker ESG commitment. Board size exhibits a non-linear effect, suggesting that excessively large boards may hinder communication efficiency. Furthermore, the presence of CSR committees and higher ESG scores contributes to more comprehensive reporting on innovative activities. The findings highlight the complementary relationship between governance quality, sustainability orientation, and R&D disclosure. The study offers insights for policymakers, investors, and corporate leaders seeking to strengthen innovation transparency under the evolving requirements of the CSRD.

References

Aboody, D., & Lev, B. (2002). Information asymmetry, R&D, and insider gains. The Journal of Finance, 55(6), 2747–2766. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00305

Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.007

AFEP–MEDEF Code of Corporate Governance. (2023).

Ahmed, K., & Courtis, J. K. (1999). Associations between corporate characteristics and disclosure levels. The British Accounting Review, 31(1), 35–61. https://doi.org/10.1006/bare.1998.0082

Ahmed, M. S., & King, T. (2025). The dark side of intangibles? Organizational capital and corporate investment efficiency. Journal of Accounting Literature, 47(5), 444–489.

https://doi.org/10.1108/JAL-06-2024-0120

Bear, S., Rahman, N., & Post, C. (2010). The impact of board diversity and gender composition on CSR and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(2), 207–221.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0505-2 Ahmed, M. S., & King, T. (2025)

Cerbioni, F., & Parbonetti, A. (2007).

Exploring the effects of corporate governance on intellectual capital disclosure: An analysis of European biotechnology companies. European Accounting Review, 16(4), 791–826.

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180701707011

Conheady, B., McIlkenny, P., Opong, K. K., & Pignatel, I. (2014). Board effectiveness and firm performance of Canadian listed firms. The British Accounting Review, 46(3), 290–303.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2014.02.002

Copé–Zimmermann Law. (2017). Loi n°2011-103 du 27 janvier 2011 (France).

Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD). (2022). Directive (EU) 2022/2464.

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2011.04.003

Eng, L. L., & Mak, Y. T. (2003). Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 22(4), 325–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-4254(03)00037-1

Erben Yavuz, A., Kocaman, B. E., Doğan, M., Hazar, A., Babuşcu, Ş., & Sutbayeva, R. (2024). The Impact of Corporate Governance on Sustainability Disclosures: A Comparison from the Perspective of Financial and Non-Financial Firms. Sustainability, 16(19):8400.

https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198400

European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS). (2023). EFRAG.

Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325. https://doi.org/10.1086/467037

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.

???? Ouvrage – pas de DOI

Gul, F. A., & Leung, S. (2004). Board leadership, outside directors’ expertise, and voluntary disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 30(4), 351–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2004.07.001

Hillman, A. J., & Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 383–396. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.10196729

Jensen, M. C. (1993). The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. Journal of Finance, 48(3), 831–880. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb04022.x

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

Liao, L., Luo, L., & Tang, Q. (2015). Gender diversity, board independence, environmental committee and greenhouse gas disclosure. The British Accounting Review, 47(4), 409–424.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2014.01.002

Lim, S., Matolcsy, Z., & Chow, D. (2007). The association between board composition and voluntary disclosure. European Accounting Review, 16(3), 555–583.

https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180701507155

Maaloul, A., & Zéghal, D. (2015). Financial statement informativeness and intellectual capital disclosure: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 13(1), 66–90. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-04-2014-0023

Metwally, A. B. M., Abdalla, G. S. S., Aly, S. A. S., & Ali, M. A. S. (2025), ESG Disclosure and Firm Value: Do Audit Committee Characteristics and Sustainability Committee Matter? International Journal of Financial Studies, 13(4), Article 188

DOI : https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs13040188

Miloud, T. (2024). Corporate governance and CSR disclosure: Evidence from French listed companies. Global Finance Journal, 59, 100943. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2024.100943 (Zeghal)

Nekhili, M., Boubaker, S., & Lakhal, F. (2015). Ownership structure, voluntary R&D disclosure and market value. International Review of Financial Analysis, 40, 38–51.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2015.04.005

Nekhili, M., Nagati, H., Chtioui, T., & Rebolledo, C. (2017). Corporate social responsibility disclosure and market value: Family versus nonfamily firms. Journal of Business Research, 77, 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.04.001

Rauf, F., Wanqiu, W., Naveed, K., & Zhang, Y. (2024). Green R&D investment, ESG reporting, and corporate green innovation performance. PLOS ONE, 19(3), e0299707. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0299707

Samaha, K., Khlif, H., & Hussainey, K. (2015). The impact of board and audit committee characteristics on voluntary disclosure. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 5(1), 2–32. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-11-2011-0031

Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331

Zéghal, D., & Maaloul, A. (2011). The accounting treatment of intangibles – A critical review of the literature. Accounting Forum, 35(4), 262–274.

Published

2026-01-06

How to Cite

Lakhal, N., & Guizani, A. (2026). Corporate governance, ESG, and innovation transparency: Evidence from French listed firms. International Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 73–106. Retrieved from http://ijeponline.org/index.php/journal/article/view/1239

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles