The impact of corporate social responsibility dimensions on sustainable competitive advantage in Lafarge Holcim M’Sila

Authors

  • Zemouri Imane University of M’sila, Algeria
  • Abdel Aalim Bachiri University of Algiers 3, Algeria

Keywords:

Social Responsibility, Economic Responsibility, Legal Responsibility, Ethical Responsibility, Charitable Responsibility, Sustainable Competitive Advantage

Abstract

This study aimed to highlight the impact of the dimensions of corporate social responsibility on sustainable competitive advantage by applying them to Lafarge Holcim in M'sila. To achieve the study's objectives, a descriptive methodology was employed. Primary data were collected using a specially designed questionnaire, distributed to executives within the Lafarge Holcim institution. Their opinions were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS.V25). The study revealed several key findings, including the significance that Lafarge Holcim in M'sila attaches to the dimensions of corporate social responsibility. The results of the causal relationship test indicated a statistically significant impact of the three social responsibility dimensions (economic, legal, and ethical responsibility) on sustainable competitive advantage. However, there was no statistically significant effect of philanthropic responsibility on sustainable competitive advantage in the studied company.

References

Barney, J. B. (1991). "Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage." Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.

Carroll, A. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4).

Carroll, A. (1999). Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of a Definitional Construct. Business & Society, 38(3).

Carrol, A. (2000). Ethical challenges for business in the new millennium: Corporate social responsibility and models of management morality. Business Ethics Quarterly, 10(1).

Day, J. S. (1994). The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations. Journal of Marketing, 58(4);

Edelman. (2021). "Edelman Trust Barometer 2021." Edelman Trust Barometer.

Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Hoskisson, R. E. (2020). Strategic Management: Concepts and Cases Competitiveness and Globalization. 13eme edition: Cengage Learning.

Kale, P., Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (2002). "Alliance Capability, Stock Market Response, and Long‐Term Alliance Success: The Role of the Alliance Function." Strategic Management Journal, 23(8);

Lee, D. R., Lee, S., & Kim, Y. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and firm value in the airline industry. Journal of Travel Research, 52(6).

McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1).

Porter, M. E. (1985). "Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance." Free Press.

Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating Shared Value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1);

PwC. (2020). "The ESG Journey: A Roadmap to a Sustainable Future." PwC ESG Pulse, 6.

Reichheld, F. F. (1996). "The Loyalty Effect: The Hidden Force Behind Growth, Profits, and Lasting Value." Harvard Business Review Press.

Teece, D. J. (2007). "Explicating Dynamic Capabilities: The Nature and Micro foundations of (Sustainable) Enterprise Performance." Strategic Management Journal, 28(13).

Turban, D. B., & Greening, D. W. (1997). Corporate Social Performance and Organizational Attractiveness to Prospective Employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3).

Published

2025-10-24

How to Cite

Imane, Z., & Bachiri, A. A. (2025). The impact of corporate social responsibility dimensions on sustainable competitive advantage in Lafarge Holcim M’Sila. International Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(10), 200–216. Retrieved from http://ijeponline.org/index.php/journal/article/view/1200

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles